LAMZU Inca vs WLmouse Huan M: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- Both are the same length.
- Both are the same width.
- The WLmouse Huan M is 1 mm lower than the LAMZU Inca.
- The WLmouse Huan M is 10 g heavier than the LAMZU Inca.
- Both are medium mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | LAMZU Inca | WLmouse Huan M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122 mm | 122 mm | 0 |
| Width | 63 mm | 63 mm | 0 |
| Height | 40 mm | 39 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 50 g | +10 g |
| Size | Medium | Medium | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- LAMZU Inca: about 18.5 cm in a palm grip, 19.7 cm in a claw grip, 21.0 cm in a fingertip grip.
- WLmouse Huan M: about 18.5 cm in a palm grip, 19.7 cm in a claw grip, 21.0 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.