Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 0.1 mm shorter than the Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 1.6 mm wider than the Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X.
- Both are the same height.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 6 g lighter than the Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X.
- Both are medium mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 120.1 mm | 120 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 62.4 mm | 64 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Height | 40.5 mm | 40.5 mm | 0 |
| Weight | 53 g | 47 g | −6 g |
| Size | Medium | Medium | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- Pulsar Pro Series Jinggg-X: about 18.2 cm in a palm grip, 19.4 cm in a claw grip, 20.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium: about 18.2 cm in a palm grip, 19.4 cm in a claw grip, 20.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.