G-Wolves HTR 8K vs Pulsar X2F: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The Pulsar X2F is 4.5 mm shorter than the G-Wolves HTR 8K.
- The Pulsar X2F is 4.1 mm wider than the G-Wolves HTR 8K.
- The Pulsar X2F is 3.4 mm lower than the G-Wolves HTR 8K.
- The Pulsar X2F is 12 g heavier than the G-Wolves HTR 8K.
- Both are small mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | G-Wolves HTR 8K | Pulsar X2F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 92 mm | 87.5 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Width | 57 mm | 61.1 mm | +4.1 mm |
| Height | 35 mm | 31.6 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Weight | 26 g | 38 g | +12 g |
| Size | Small | Small | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- G-Wolves HTR 8K: about 13.9 cm in a palm grip, 14.8 cm in a claw grip, 15.9 cm in a fingertip grip.
- Pulsar X2F: about 13.3 cm in a palm grip, 14.1 cm in a claw grip, 15.1 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.