G-Wolves HTS Wireless vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 1 mm longer than the G-Wolves HTS Wireless.
- Both are the same width.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 2 mm lower than the G-Wolves HTS Wireless.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 15 g lighter than the G-Wolves HTS Wireless.
- Both are small mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | G-Wolves HTS Wireless | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 113 mm | 114 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 61 mm | 0 |
| Height | 40 mm | 38 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 58 g | 43 g | −15 g |
| Size | Small | Small | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- G-Wolves HTS Wireless: about 17.1 cm in a palm grip, 18.2 cm in a claw grip, 19.5 cm in a fingertip grip.
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini: about 17.3 cm in a palm grip, 18.4 cm in a claw grip, 19.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.