LAMZU Inca vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 2 mm shorter than the LAMZU Inca.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 1 mm wider than the LAMZU Inca.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 0.5 mm taller than the LAMZU Inca.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 7 g heavier than the LAMZU Inca.
- Both are medium mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | LAMZU Inca | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122 mm | 120 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 63 mm | 64 mm | +1 mm |
| Height | 40 mm | 40.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 47 g | +7 g |
| Size | Medium | Medium | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- LAMZU Inca: about 18.5 cm in a palm grip, 19.7 cm in a claw grip, 21.0 cm in a fingertip grip.
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium: about 18.2 cm in a palm grip, 19.4 cm in a claw grip, 20.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.