Logitech G203 Lightsync vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 2.6 mm shorter than the Logitech G203 Lightsync.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 1.1 mm narrower than the Logitech G203 Lightsync.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 0.2 mm lower than the Logitech G203 Lightsync.
- The Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini is 42 g lighter than the Logitech G203 Lightsync.
- Both are small mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | Logitech G203 Lightsync | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 116.6 mm | 114 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 62.1 mm | 61 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Height | 38.2 mm | 38 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 85 g | 43 g | −42 g |
| Size | Small | Small | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wired | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- Logitech G203 Lightsync: about 17.7 cm in a palm grip, 18.8 cm in a claw grip, 20.1 cm in a fingertip grip.
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini: about 17.3 cm in a palm grip, 18.4 cm in a claw grip, 19.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.