Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini vs Redragon M817: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The Redragon M817 is 9 mm shorter than the Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini.
- The Redragon M817 is 1 mm narrower than the Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini.
- Both are the same height.
- The Redragon M817 is 6 g lighter than the Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini.
- Both are small mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini | Redragon M817 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 114 mm | 105 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 60 mm | −1 mm |
| Height | 38 mm | 38 mm | 0 |
| Weight | 43 g | 37 g | −6 g |
| Size | Small | Small | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wired |
The hand size each one suits
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Mini: about 17.3 cm in a palm grip, 18.4 cm in a claw grip, 19.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
- Redragon M817: about 15.9 cm in a palm grip, 16.9 cm in a claw grip, 18.1 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.