Pulsar X2F vs WLmouse Beast Miao: size, weight and shape compared
Two mice side by side; every difference is computed from the specifications.
How they differ
- The WLmouse Beast Miao is 3.5 mm longer than the Pulsar X2F.
- The WLmouse Beast Miao is 6.1 mm narrower than the Pulsar X2F.
- The WLmouse Beast Miao is 2.4 mm taller than the Pulsar X2F.
- The WLmouse Beast Miao is 7 g lighter than the Pulsar X2F.
- Both are small mice.
- Both have a symmetrical shape.
Specifications
| Spec | Pulsar X2F | WLmouse Beast Miao | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 87.5 mm | 91 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Width | 61.1 mm | 55 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Height | 31.6 mm | 34 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 38 g | 31 g | −7 g |
| Size | Small | Small | |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical | |
| Connection | Wireless | Wireless |
The hand size each one suits
- Pulsar X2F: about 13.3 cm in a palm grip, 14.1 cm in a claw grip, 15.1 cm in a fingertip grip.
- WLmouse Beast Miao: about 13.8 cm in a palm grip, 14.7 cm in a claw grip, 15.7 cm in a fingertip grip.
These ratios are provisional and will be tuned from user feedback.
This compares length only. Scan your hand and Palmate compares both mice with your hand on all six parts.
Specifications come from public data and official sites; the maker's information comes first, so check it before you buy. Palmate is not affiliated with any brand.